|
The term "Fee-Only"
has caused significant confusion for
many investors trying to determine
how financial advisor, planners, or
sales representatives are compensated.
Basically advisors are compensated
in one of three ways: Commission only
(compensation derived entirely by
the providers of products sold to
consumers); Fee-only (fees paid solely
by the client and in which no
commissions or compensation is received
from other sources; and a combination
of fees and commissions. Some terms
used to describe this fee and commission
compensation format includes: "commission-based",
"fees & commission", "fee-based",
or "fee-offset" to describe their
compensation format. In each of these
cases, the planner usually charges
both a fee and receives commissions
from the products sold.
However, many financial
advisors who call themselves "fee-only"
actually receive product commissions
as well, often with the consumer not
aware of those charges. This is often
the case with annuity or mutual fund
products sold with "back-end" loads
or surrender charges.
When an individual
selects a financial advisor, beside
the expertise, integrity, and experience
of the advisor, he or she is looking
for objective advice. This advice
may be influenced according to how
a particular advisor is compensated.
We believe that a relatively small
percentage of individuals offering
financial advise actually get paid
exclusively for their advice. The
majority earn some or all of their
income by the selling of stocks, mutual
funds, annuities, insurance, or other
financial products to implement their
recommendations. We feel that many
of these "advisors" are actually financial
salespersons who face a financial
conflict of interest and are often
encouraged to direct clients into
products in which they have a financial
interest. The greater the advisor's
dependence on commission income, obviously
the greater this potential conflict
of interest.
Becase of how they're
compensated, many commission-based
planners are unlikely to recommend
no-load or low-load products or services
or may recommend those investments
with higher commissions or special
considerations for the planner. Unfortunately
too, there is often a direct correlation
to the riskiness of a product and
the potential commissions to the planner
which often results in a riskier investment
than would otherwise be recommended.
For several reasons,
commission-based financial planning
remains very popular because it appears
more affordable for the customer because
the fee is often "hidden" in the price
of the product or along with other
"annual fees". As a result, the customer
is often not able to distinguish the
fee or commission as clearly as compared
to an out-of-pocket or up-front fee.
(The government relies on a similar
"hidden" tax payment structure by
having employers withdraw employee's
personal income taxes during the year
instead of having the taxpayer make
inc tax payments "out-of-pocket" at
the end of the year).
At Pace Financial
Services we believe the focus should
be on the benefits to our clients
from the planning and services we
provide. For this reason, we charge
no commissions, but bill our fees
directly to our clients. Unlike many
commission-based formats, these fees
are never hidden and the client is
always aware of exactly what he or
she is paying. We have enough confidence
in the value of our services that
we believe the client will willingly
pay a reasonable fee for our services.
Just as we ask our clients to be open
and honest with us about their personal
financial situation, we want to be
clear and open with our clients about
the fees we charge.
Here's what a few
well-known financial publications
had to say recently on the benefits
of fee-only planners:
"The Most important
matter is how the planner is compensated.
Hire the planner who...has no financial
stake in (your) investments."Forbes
"Start with the
general practitioner...a Financial
Planner (whose) compensation should
be from fees alone.", Money Magazine
"Financial Planners
who take commissions have a built-in
conflict of interest...even with disclosure,
my choice would be a Fee-Only Planner.",
Newsweek Magazine
At Pace Financial
Services we believe the focus should
be on what we can do for our clients.
And although the fee-only method of
compensation is no guarantee to avoid
conflicts of interests, we have found
such a format to be most effective
in leading to a long-term relationship
between the client and planner.
|